The law is a body of rules that is intended to control the culpable conduct of people. And while lots of folks may not agree with the existence of the law it still is a crucial and essential side of any society. But to control the improper application of the law it is really important to set down a couple of things that are predicted of a good legal system. There cannot ever be a functional legal system if it's not clear.

When folks turn to the courts they naturally expect the judges and prosecutors to act with ethics and truth. But if the people answerable for applying the law are deceptive the foundation on which justice rests will be shook to a dead stop. The confidence which folks will have in a clear rule of law will somehow or other urge them to be law abiding and deferential of the law and its expectations. Court cases are brought before the courts to be finished and concluded. The cures the courts give are expected with much agitation and nervousness so it is crucial that the law be applied with potency.

The fast conclusion of court cases means justice prevails rather than disappointment and hysteria. Instead of postponing hearings constantly the courts must make sure that cases are brought to a close fast while at the very same time bringing about a fair and equitable conclusion to cases. The law is pointless if it is applied unjustly and unfairly. Justice is best served when the very best end result that pleases both parties is attained. There are sufficient examples where cash overcame over justice and criminals went on to commit the same offences as the ones they were charged for in the beginning. So for a legal system to be presumed good it must make certain that justice and fairness overcome over any other competing interests.

Corruption is when an advantage is given or accepted in return for a favour. Even though corruptibility is inevitable like oxygen it's best fought in the courts than any place else.

The people trusted with applying and effecting the law must not accept bribes from the well off who would like to have the results of cases sway in their direction. There is not any real use in having the law if the people trusted with the responsibility of defending it are corrupt themselves ; they must lead by example if they need others to respect the law. In any country there are lower courts and higher courts.

Each time a person isn't satisfied by the choice in a lower court they have the privilege to appeal on the premise of the wrong application of the law or techniques.

This system of checks and balances is a good eventuality to have and it basically rids the justice system of corruptibility and inefficiency. For a justice system to run smoothly it's got to be free of central authority influence. There'll always be circumstances where executive officers get surrounded in legal battles that threaten their political careers. As anticipated these officers do pretty much everything in their power to be sure that they remain free and out of jail. To get round this guardians of the law must be independent of government influence and separatist. And before anything gains significance over the law there has to be liability. If any judge ; prosecutor or officer does something wrong he should come out in the open and confess. This responsibility raises the peoples's confidence in the law.